impuls one
176 Employer Review(s)
Colleagues:
Supervisor:
Tasks:
Salary:
Career:
OVERALL:
Location
#
Country
Date
Rating
Review
Annaberg buchholz 1
11.05.2016
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Annaberg Buchholz 2
11.05.2016
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Bad kreuznach 3
13.02.2016
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Bad Langensalza 4
15.02.2016
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Not recommendable employer.
Bad Langensalza 5
15.02.2016
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Lack of community spirit. Problematic management style. Mere Work carried out. Lower wage level. Rare upgrades. Not recommendable employer.
Berlin 6
27.12.2015
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Sufficient cohesion. Useful management. Acceptable service. Below-average salary. Average recognition. Employers with criticisms.
Berlin 7
15.03.2016
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Functioning collegiality. Problematic management style. Filling employment. Lower wage level. Rare upgrades. Not recommendable employer.
Berlin 8
03.04.2016
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Employers with criticisms.
Berlin 9
01.03.2015
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Lack of unity. Need to improve personnel management. No filling operation. Rare upgrades. Employers with criticisms.
Berlin 10
16.10.2015
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Employers with criticisms.
Berlin 11
23.02.2018
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Not recommendable employer.
Berlin 12
03.04.2016
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Employers with criticisms.
Berlin 13
14.11.2013
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Recommendable workplace.
Berlin 14
03.04.2016
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Pleasant cooperation. Need to improve personnel management. Filling employment. Demotivating income. Average recognition. Employers with criticisms.
Berlin 15
29.09.2021
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Sufficient cohesion. Need to improve personnel management. Acceptable service. Lower wage level. Not recommendable employer.
Berlin 16
15.03.2016
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Not recommendable employer.
Berlin 17
18.02.2015
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Lack of community spirit. Problematic management style. Acceptable service. Rare upgrades. Employers with criticisms.
Berlin 18
29.09.2021
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Not recommendable employer.
Braunschweig 19
25.06.2016
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Functioning collegiality. Need to improve personnel management. Acceptable service. Below-average salary. Average recognition. Employers with criticisms.
Diverse 20
30.08.2016
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Not recommendable employer.
diverse 21
30.08.2016
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Sufficient cohesion. Need to improve personnel management. Mere Work carried out. Lower wage level. Rickety ladder of success. Not recommendable employer.
Döbeln 22
13.11.2014
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Lack of community spirit. Problematic management style. No filling operation. Lower wage level. Rare upgrades. Not recommendable employer.
Dresden 23
14.11.2013
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Pleasant cooperation. Good Management. Filling employment. Below-average salary. Beneficial career. Recommendable workplace.
Halle 24
09.01.2016
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Not recommendable employer.
Halle 25
27.10.2015
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Lack of unity. Problematic management style. Filling employment. Lower wage level. Rare upgrades. Not recommendable employer.
Halle 26
09.01.2016
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Not recommendable employer.
Hamburg 27
18.05.2015
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Functioning collegiality. Satisfactory staff work. Below-average salary. Rare upgrades. Satisfactory employment site.
Hamburg 28
19.05.2015
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Employers with criticisms.
Hannover 29
13.07.2019
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Lack of community spirit. Problematic management style. Mere Work carried out. Lower wage level. Not recommendable employer.
Hannover 30
15.11.2019
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Not recommendable employer.
Hannover 31
13.07.2019
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Not recommendable employer.
Hannover 32
11.08.2020
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Sufficient cohesion. Problematic management style. Mere Work carried out. Lower wage level. Rare upgrades. Not recommendable employer.
Herne 33
15.03.2016
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Reasonable job provider.
Herne 34
19.08.2015
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Lack of unity. Problematic management style. No filling operation. Lower wage level. Rare upgrades. Not recommendable employer.
Holzminden 35
18.04.2017
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Not recommendable employer.
Germany 36
13.07.2016
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Germany 37
17.08.2016
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Pleasant cooperation. Satisfactory staff work. Filling employment. Lower wage level. Average recognition. Employers with criticisms.
Germany 38
07.10.2016
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Germany 39
18.07.2018
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Germany 40
09.11.2016
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Germany 41
10.07.2016
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Germany 42
01.07.2016
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Germany 43
14.02.2016
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Germany 44
12.03.2016
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Employers with criticisms.
Germany 45
17.12.2015
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Pleasant cooperation. Problematic management style. Acceptable service. Demotivating income. Rare upgrades. Reasonable job provider.
Germany 46
17.10.2018
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Not recommendable employer.
Germany 47
18.07.2018
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Germany 48
11.10.2017
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Not recommendable employer.
Germany 49
05.09.2021
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Germany 50
10.09.2021
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Germany 51
22.04.2021
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Germany 52
07.11.2021
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Germany 53
10.11.2016
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Germany 54
04.12.2016
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Germany 55
28.06.2018
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Germany 56
13.02.2018
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Germany 57
14.02.2018
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Germany 58
19.02.2018
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Germany 59
16.10.2019
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Germany 60
17.10.2018
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Employers with criticisms.
Germany 61
12.11.2018
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Germany 62
07.11.2019
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Germany 63
15.01.2020
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Germany 64
10.02.2019
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Germany 65
21.02.2019
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Germany 66
13.09.2019
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Germany 67
14.05.2023
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Germany 68
25.11.2017
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Germany 69
27.01.2017
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Germany 70
17.02.2017
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Germany 71
08.04.2017
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Not recommendable employer.
Germany 72
21.06.2017
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Germany 73
27.06.2017
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Germany 74
20.10.2020
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Germany 75
24.07.2017
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Germany 76
22.08.2017
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Germany 77
25.08.2017
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Germany 78
16.09.2020
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Germany 79
03.11.2017
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Germany 80
07.11.2017
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Germany 81
07.11.2019
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Germany 82
13.02.2016
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Germany 83
04.08.2019
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Germany 84
20.05.2016
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Germany 85
15.04.2014
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Pleasant cooperation. Problematic management style. No filling operation. Lower wage level. Rare upgrades. Not recommendable employer.
Germany 86
08.12.2014
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Functioning collegiality. Satisfactory staff work. Acceptable service. Not recommendable employer.
Germany 87
17.12.2014
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Not recommendable employer.
Germany 88
08.09.2016
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Germany 89
24.05.2015
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Not recommendable employer.
Germany 90
02.03.2015
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Functioning collegiality. Problematic management style. Mere Work carried out. Lower wage level. Rare upgrades. Not recommendable employer.
Germany 91
13.03.2015
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Pleasant cooperation. Need to improve personnel management. Mere Work carried out. Lower wage level. Rare upgrades. Not recommendable employer.
Germany 92
04.03.2015
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Germany 93
04.03.2015
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Germany 94
08.03.2015
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Functioning collegiality. Problematic management style. Filling employment. Lower wage level. Rare upgrades. Not recommendable employer.
Germany 95
02.12.2015
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Germany 96
04.03.2015
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Not recommendable employer.
Germany 97
27.01.2016
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Not recommendable employer.
Germany 98
30.08.2015
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Pleasant cooperation. Problematic management style. Filling employment. Lower wage level. Rare upgrades. Not recommendable employer.
Germany 99
12.10.2015
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Germany 100
12.10.2015
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Germany 101
14.01.2016
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Not recommendable employer.
Germany 102
24.04.2016
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Sufficient cohesion. Problematic management style. Acceptable service. Demotivating income. Rickety ladder of success. Reasonable job provider.
Germany 103
29.01.2016
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Functioning collegiality. Problematic management style. Mere Work carried out. Lower wage level. Rare upgrades. Not recommendable employer.
Germany 104
14.01.2016
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Germany 105
14.01.2016
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Not recommendable employer.
Germany 106
02.11.2015
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Germany 107
15.07.2015
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Employers with criticisms.
Germany 108
17.12.2015
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Reasonable job provider.
Germany 109
24.11.2015
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Cologne 110
11.11.2015
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Employers with criticisms.
Cologne 111
17.07.2019
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Leipzig 112
15.09.2017
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Functioning collegiality. Problematic management style. Acceptable service. Lower wage level. Rare upgrades. Not recommendable employer.
Leipzig 113
13.01.2018
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Not recommendable employer.
Leipzig 114
13.01.2018
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Functioning collegiality. Problematic management style. Filling employment. Lower wage level. Rare upgrades. Not recommendable employer.
Leipzig 115
28.02.2016
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Functioning collegiality. Problematic management style. Filling employment. Lower wage level. Rare upgrades. Not recommendable employer.
Leipzig 116
04.03.2015
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Functioning collegiality. Problematic management style. Mere Work carried out. Lower wage level. Rare upgrades. Not recommendable employer.
Leipzig 117
15.09.2017
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Not recommendable employer.
Ludwigsfelde 118
05.05.2021
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Employers with criticisms.
Lüneburg 119
03.03.2016
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Employers with criticisms.
Lüneburg 120
03.03.2016
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Sufficient cohesion. Useful management. Mere Work carried out. Lower wage level. Rickety ladder of success. Employers with criticisms.
Magdeburg 121
23.01.2017
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Lack of community spirit. Problematic management style. Mere Work carried out. Lower wage level. Rare upgrades. Not recommendable employer.
Minden 122
13.06.2017
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Satisfactory employment site.
Minden 123
15.09.2015
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Recommendable workplace.
Mölln 124
08.04.2016
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Not recommendable employer.
Mölln 125
08.04.2016
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Not recommendable employer.
Mölln 126
08.04.2016
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Sufficient cohesion. Need to improve personnel management. Filling employment. Not recommendable employer.
Monschau 127
19.05.2016
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Not recommendable employer.
Munich 128
31.10.2019
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Not recommendable employer.
Munich 129
19.05.2021
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Not recommendable employer.
Neubrandenburg 130
18.03.2014
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Lack of unity. Need to improve personnel management. Acceptable service. Lower wage level. Average recognition. Not recommendable employer.
Neumünster 131
07.12.2018
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Niedersachsen 132
14.03.2017
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Employers with criticisms.
Osnabrück 133
03.11.2020
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Podsdam 134
18.09.2020
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Lack of community spirit. Problematic management style. Mere Work carried out. Lower wage level. Not recommendable employer.
Potsdam 135
20.11.2013
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Lack of community spirit. Impeccable Leadership. Interesting tasks. Rare upgrades. Recommendable workplace.
Potsdam 136
20.07.2016
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Functioning collegiality. Problematic management style. Interesting tasks. Demotivating income. Rare upgrades. Not recommendable employer.
Potsdam 137
20.07.2016
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Not recommendable employer.
Sachsen 138
30.08.2015
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Not recommendable employer.
Schönebeck 139
07.04.2016
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Employers with criticisms.
Schwedt 140
27.12.2017
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Satisfactory employment site.
Stahnsdorf 141
10.11.2013
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Sufficient cohesion. Problematic management style. No filling operation. Lower wage level. Rare upgrades. Not recommendable employer.
Stahnsdorf 142
23.10.2015
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Reasonable job provider.
Stahnsdorf 143
12.01.2016
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Lack of unity. Problematic management style. No filling operation. Lower wage level. Not recommendable employer.
Stahnsdorf 144
16.12.2016
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Sufficient cohesion. Problematic management style. Mere Work carried out. Lower wage level. Rare upgrades. Not recommendable employer.
Stahnsdorf 145
16.12.2016
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Not recommendable employer.
Stahnsdorf 146
10.06.2014
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Lack of unity. Problematic management style. Acceptable service. Lower wage level. Rare upgrades. Not recommendable employer.
Stahnsdorf 147
19.08.2021
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Pleasant cooperation. Impeccable Leadership. Filling employment. Below-average salary. Average recognition. Satisfactory employment site.
Stahnsdorf 148
23.04.2017
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Sufficient cohesion. Need to improve personnel management. Mere Work carried out. Lower wage level. Rare upgrades. Not recommendable employer.
Stahnsdorf 149
21.09.2015
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Lack of community spirit. Need to improve personnel management. Acceptable service. Fair payments. Average recognition. Not recommendable employer.
Stahnsdorf 150
31.03.2017
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Lack of unity. Need to improve personnel management. Acceptable service. Demotivating income. Rickety ladder of success. Employers with criticisms.
Stahnsdorf 151
05.12.2014
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Functioning collegiality. Problematic management style. Mere Work carried out. Lower wage level. Rare upgrades. Not recommendable employer.
Stahnsdorf 152
29.11.2014
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Stahnsdorf 153
10.06.2014
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Sufficient cohesion. Need to improve personnel management. Interesting tasks. Lower wage level. Rare upgrades. Satisfactory employment site.
Stahnsdorf 154
27.03.2017
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Sufficient cohesion. Satisfactory staff work. Acceptable service. Lower wage level. Rare upgrades. Not recommendable employer.
Stahnsdorf 155
19.08.2021
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Satisfactory employment site.
Stahnsdorf 156
03.03.2017
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Not recommendable employer.
Stahnsdorf 157
03.03.2017
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Functioning collegiality. Problematic management style. Mere Work carried out. Lower wage level. Rare upgrades. Not recommendable employer.
Stahnsdorf 158
27.07.2013
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Functioning collegiality. Need to improve personnel management. Acceptable service. Demotivating income. Rare upgrades. Satisfactory employment site.
Stahnsdorf 159
10.06.2014
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Lack of unity. Problematic management style. Acceptable service. Lower wage level. Rare upgrades. Not recommendable employer.
Stahnsdorf 160
02.12.2013
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Sufficient cohesion. Need to improve personnel management. Filling employment. Demotivating income. Rare upgrades. Not recommendable employer.
Stahnsdorf 161
21.03.2014
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Sufficient cohesion. Problematic management style. No filling operation. Lower wage level. Rare upgrades. Employers with criticisms.
Stahnsdorf 162
16.11.2013
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Lack of unity. Need to improve personnel management. Acceptable service. Demotivating income. Average recognition. Employers with criticisms.
Stahnsdorf 163
05.12.2015
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Functioning collegiality. Problematic management style. Acceptable service. Lower wage level. Rare upgrades. Not recommendable employer.
Stahnsdorf 164
02.04.2014
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Pleasant cooperation. Satisfactory staff work. Acceptable service. Fair payments. Rickety ladder of success. Excellent employer.
Stahnsdorf 165
20.10.2013
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Pleasant cooperation. Problematic management style. Filling employment. Lower wage level. Rare upgrades. Employers with criticisms.
Stahnsdorf 166
19.02.2020
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Lack of community spirit. Problematic management style. Mere Work carried out. Rare upgrades. Not recommendable employer.
Stahnsdorf 167
18.08.2013
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Functioning collegiality. Problematic management style. Acceptable service. Lower wage level. Rare upgrades. Employers with criticisms.
Stahnsdorf 168
03.04.2014
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Functioning collegiality. Need to improve personnel management. Acceptable service. Lower wage level. Rare upgrades. Not recommendable employer.
Stahnsdorf 169
26.08.2013
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Lack of unity. Problematic management style. No filling operation. Lower wage level. Rare upgrades. Not recommendable employer.
Stahnsdorf 170
16.12.2015
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Functioning collegiality. Useful management. No filling operation. Below-average salary. Rickety ladder of success. Reasonable job provider.
Stahnsdorf 171
05.12.2015
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Not recommendable employer.
Stahnsdorf 172
10.08.2013
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Lack of community spirit. Problematic management style. Mere Work carried out. Rare upgrades. Reasonable job provider.
Stahnsdorf 173
18.08.2013
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Functioning collegiality. Problematic management style. Acceptable service. Lower wage level. Rare upgrades. Not recommendable employer.
Stahnsdorf 174
11.06.2018
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Functioning collegiality. Problematic management style. Mere Work carried out. Lower wage level. Rare upgrades. Not recommendable employer.
Stansdorf 175
11.06.2018
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Not recommendable employer.
Waldkraiburg 176
08.10.2020
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Lack of community spirit. Problematic management style. Mere Work carried out. Lower wage level. Rare upgrades. Not recommendable employer.
